Higher Education Debate : INDIA

If you have followed the news media of India, you would have learnt about the intense debate going on regarding the higher education funding and admissions criteria. The Government has raised the budgetary support for education in its most recent Budget. Some of the well-known institutes, such as the Indian Institutes of Management, have raised their fees considerably to avoid taking government funds and support higher costs of operation. Doctors have been striking work protesting the perceived reduction of Post-Graduate seats available to the “open” category. And, there are many debates raging……including on TV Channels.

In this context and environment, it would be worthwhile to learn what world-class American Universities are doing - surprisingly, they have extended significantly huge support to the low-income students. I urge you to read the attached article from New York Times.

“The (Yes) Low Cost of Higher Education by David Leonhardt”

How relevant is this to the ongoing debate in India - I found it very relevant. Serious matter to think through (very) carefully in a dispassionate manner befitting policy makers.

Have a good week ahead,

Cheers

Vijay Srinivasan
20 April 2008
Mumbai

Published in: on April 20, 2008 at 9:22 pm Comments (0)
Tags:

Value of Human Life

I never properly understood the valuation of human life in developing countries.

Human Life appeared to be cheap in the under-developed countries of the world in the past, and that included most countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Now, several such countries are in the process of attaining an “emerging” or “developing” status, which in my mind really means a GDP Growth Rate faster than 6% as a ballpark, and a per-capita income approaching USD1,000 or more atleast in the more populous countries. However, this does not, by any chance, mean that the “Human Development Index” in these “developing” countries is improving in tandem.

Apart from the well-documented economic disparity between the haves and have-nots which is worsening in a very skewed manner as the emerging economies develop faster, the resulting rush to Western Consumption patterns amongst the younger generation is leading to behavioural tendencies with utter disregard to human life. Youngsters in developing countries such as India today wish to emulate their American counterparts closely, right from dress sense to soap operas to food habits. This also includes a “holier-than-thou” attitude in the economically stronger sub-section of the society, which while numerically smaller, has a big concentration in small pockets across urban societies with influence disproportionately higher than it should be, even on the poorer sub-sections of the same societies.

Such concentration leads to a wealth “show-off” effect, with people able to afford fast bikes and cars. In a large metropolis like Mumbai, there are many affluent pockets of society, as there are slums. The complete nonchalance exhibited by the wealthier sections of youngsters towards the human habitation in public places by the very poor migrants is totally reprehensible. Many murders have happened in the streets over the past year and a half, due to the total negligence of young and fast drivers (who sometimes do not even have driving licences) who lost control due to their recklessness or drunkenness. While Mumbai Police Authorities have taken up a vigorous drive to control drunken driving, the issue in India is still the same - one of enforcement in a consistent and uniform manner. Lack of automated means to track reckless driving and a rapid response system to nab criminal drivers continue to inhibit effective enforcement.

In a nutshell, human life has not much meaning in developing countries like India - it can be dispensed with conveniently to satisfy the ravages of the economically advanced sections of the society many a time, or it can be “bought”. The lack of success of “socialism” is evident over four decades of lacklustre growth in India - it means “poverty distribution” rather than “poverty reduction”. The understanding of the importance of human life and human development is totally lacking at all planning levels of the government. This can be seen from the lack of serious investment in Education and Infrastructure. India probably needs atleast 5% of its annual budget to be spent on primary and secondary education, rather than constantly celebrating higher education successes and placement stories wherein management students walk away with US$ 100,000 salaries. How can 1,500 successfully placed management students impact a developing society like India’s ? How can probably 10,000 highly qualified engineers solve the problems of development in India - I am just counting the top institutes’ output here.

India (and China) continue to get poor scores in the U.N. Human Development Index as well as Corruption Index. There is very little investment in the human “software” aspect, as compared to the “hardware” infrastructure focus that governments currently are pursuing in the developing world. But the whole point will be missed if we ultimately reach an economic status, wherein there is : (a) wide disparity in the economic status across multiple strata of society - it now looks like 1% of the society is approaching a per capita income of USD 10,000 (my own estimate), while more than 80% of the society has a per capita income less than USD 500. Such skew is not helpful as the economy progresses at a rapid 9% clip over the next decade or so ; (b) there continues to be a lack of “connect” between the two extreme ends of the society, with many a youngster in the poorer sections of the society getting lost out for lack of equitable opportunities in education and jobs ; and, (c) there continues to be utter lack of focus on primary education and its infrastructure, especially in villages - there are many in the remote districts of Maharashtra wherein there are no teachers even, let alone a proper building.

We have to consciously attempt to enhance the valuation of human life on par with how a developed Western Society currently does - there is always a huge concern even at the loss of a single life in such developed societies. Why is there no such concern exhibited by the powers that be, which most of the times, tend to write off such losses easily - be that may be due to a railway accident, due to negligent and reckless driving over pavement dwellers, due to caste rivalries, etc., There are a million examples which can be gleaned from news stories around India every day. How come on one side there is a rash adoption of everything Western, while there is just no look at the best of the West - the human value being just one of the many good things in the Western Civilization ? Why should we just pick the bad things without more analysis ?

And China is no different from India - for folks who are overwhelmed by the China Story, here is an article from New York Times - over a quarter of the Chinese population is poor, despite the great strides made by China over the last three decades in uplifting its people. Please read “Lives of Grinding Poverty, Untouched by China’s Boom by Howard W. French”

Some food for thought, I guess.

Have a great, long weekend, folks.

Cheers

Vijay Srinivasan
12th Jan 2008
Mumbai

Published in: on January 12, 2008 at 6:35 pm Comments (0)
Tags: , , , ,

Spending on Education

I read today in the newspapers that Indian workers abroad sent in excess of USD 25B last year back home.

Unlike most other developing countries, this constitutes barely 3% of India’s GDP, and is just about equal to India’s defence budget this year. But the startling fact was that India spends not even one-fifth of this amount on education !

Educational standards in India are in a pathetic state, atleast in the government-run schooling system. There is too much focus on higher education to the total detriment of primary and secondary education. In fact, there has been a huge debate on IIMs (Indian Institutes of Management) and IITs (Indian Institutes of Technology) which together produce just about 3,000 undergraduates every year - Government of India spends lots of money on these folks who go on to earn hugely in the private corporate sector, or go abroad. IIMs made history in this year’s final placements, with top graduates getting in excess of USD 250,000 as salary with some investment banks, with even domestic salaries crossing Rs 1 Crore for the cream-de-la-cream. I believe these salaries are even better than what one can hope to get out of Harvard or Stanford business schools !

There has been more discussion on “reservation” of specific under-priviledged castes for these institutions, than on improving basic education which would cater to millions of students, during the past 12 months in India. Misplaced priorities and budgets, one should conclude ! One has to be cognizant of the millions of impoverished children who would never get to see the portals of an IIM or an IIT. Is anyone in the government thinking of these children ?

The best way to eliminate poverty in total would be for a government to provide for quality basic education. There has always been discrimination and poor/inadequate budgeting when it comes to primary education in India. Teachers are poorly paid, the infrastructure of government schools is very bad, and both the under-priviledged and economically disadvantaged classes face inequities when competing with the middle and upper-middle classes of the society. The issue is government of the day and of the yesteryears, never placed much importance on basic education. This has built an unequal society with social inequities which would eventually translate into societal tensions.

Some scholars argue that such problems in India somehow persist without tensions, and would eventually go away. I do not agree - that is not planning, that is hoping for the best. While communism will never take root in India, I am loathe to see wealth being talked up by newspapers almost every day - this would only mean the “wealthy” class gets a treatment by society very different from the average man. While that may be okay from the perspective of an armchair analyst, it may not be all right for a society with huge economic and digital divides spread all around the country.

In the United States, which also spends a hugely disproportionate amount on military budget (in excess of USD 500B this year), the basic necessities of society have been met long time ago and the infrastructure is in place. Further, Americans are known for their charitable bent of mind. Americans donate every day for almost every charitable cause, and philanthropy has become fashionable. Such actions help the society to get rid of any existing inequalities. Further, education has mostly been unshackled from the government. Government cannot do business anywhere properly, why leave education in its hands ? This initiative would require enormous funding, which is there in many developed economies. In developing economies, government professes that it can do a better job in addressing social inequalities and fix fundamental issues such as education, but I have not seen any one country doing a good job at it, except very small nations such as Singapore.

There is an urgent need for PPP (Public-Private-Partnership) in basic and secondary education in India. Government will never be able to balance its budget, and pay more for education, except an increase of may be 3 to 5% more annually. High-quality education at the primary level, and making it compulsory for all children, will go a long way in making a developed economic vision a reality and meeting the goals of an advanced society for social and economic equilibrium, with access being equal to all and one.

Time to think.

Cheers,

Vijay Srinivasan
20 October 2007
Mumbai